Search results

Might have posted this in the wrong forum section, but heck.... Move it (, mods, ) If you have to

As there was an ongoing discussion on how the staff can make us occupied while their attempting to finish off and push the upcoming content out sonner, I thought it would be cooler If they share their work through the twitter page what's there to come. Yeah, I know that there is a trello page...

Yeah, but like it isn't a really MUST thing. Thought it would be sweet (try maybe even suggest it under the forum suggestion page, if you really want that button to be made), but there is the alternative to "message the mod" as Loony pointed out.

I'm afraid giving that, as access to their own thread, is also a bad idea. It might just become used for wrong reasons, such as stopping discussion when the OP can't handle constructive critism, or to punish the thread rather those who when off-topic or caused flame war (that should be MOD's job...

I wouldn't overexaggerate by emphazing the words with caps. If you're using notepad++, you can EASILY EASILY switch between files to check out a move, go back to file ect. It's not like those files would be named anything else apart from respective element, eg, waterbending (wouldn't they? I...

If a a bender doesn't have a waterbubble bind, does that leaves him to be rekted? Weird observation you got there :D

You'll have to consider the depth of of the pool before you could blindly state that it takes "little" time. ....... Wat?

That's a strange argument, considering it's exact like saying "...a new passive just for taking 0 zero damage on ice could simply be avoidable". You just simple cannot avoid a passive when it's in effect all the time/automaticly, unless toggled via command. I personally see nothing wrong with...

And that's a problem why? You might not know whenever the idea appropriate or not, unless you're referring whenever the post itself isn't breaking the Forum Rules. You might think a Suggestion thread is highly unlikely to be rejected and disproved, but leaving there undeleted might have some...

But you suggested to omit that ability. Make up your mind :| Could have sworn you suggested that in the original post, but you probably edited it out. As it being passive, I disagree. I think it would be nice as an extention of a waterbubble, because it is a better fit imho. ETA Now I think...

And SwiftSwim was rarely use. A long with Surge-jet, both of them should be removed. After that is done, WaterBubble should stay as a bind with the following reasons: Was used more than once; it's canon alright. If you think it should be removed because nobody uses it, then you should consider...

http://projectkorra.com/threads/fastswim-alternative.5074/ As you can see most of us don't like. Along with Surge-jet tactic, it would be fair to remove them considering magority don't like the current airblast-oneself tactic.

How would that have to do with seismicsense? What would changing it into bedrock make it useful?

Providing an enforce error informing about the non-light geneating block and a short list what blocks can be assigned on a wiki, would not make this a big deal.

Why should it not be? I thought that's the whole point of it - to mean that the concept/idea is complete. Išsiųsta naudojantis SM-G313HN Tapatalk 4 Lt

Well, I can see why he likes Earthtunnel more than WaterBubble. Swiftswim exists, so there really any need for him to use it for the sake of fast travel. Išsiųsta naudojantis SM-G313HN Tapatalk 4 Lt

Ok... Does who don't bind WaterBubble are noobs too? :p

@xNuminousx AND I'm trying to make my point across, by comparing the two (EarthTunnel and Waterbubble) as an argument for why WaterBubble should be left alone without removing it. @Andrey_Frolov As well as you can use WaterBubble for combat. Also here are my binds as you asked me: 1...