Search results

In a way, I can totally agree with you, as I feel some abilities (not gonna point them out) are either illogical or cramp the whole element-- with their fighting style|aspect being completely from what's its canon (eg. air becoming more offensive and ect.). Now for CactusBlast. How about change...

Above*?

Honestly, he really shouldn't have done that, but since he created - what's done is done. I can only him one last critism: instead of bind, it would been better off as a passive (that is, if he doesn't intend to add more of those). ETA: Like srls, how many and WHAT abilities can you think of to...

Wait.. developers can create elements now? Oh please tell me it's not true O_O DD: Uehhw! I'm really scared of what the future of pk servers will turn out to be If they start downloading absurd-preposterous-stupid elements like wolfbending, I would really be mad.

pretty sure Simplicitee some of his speculated theories with arguments, and I believe it included on how Amon manages to achieve that type of an effect.

The Box thing above the chat, the thing that advertises your server? Yeah, that one. I think it should be updated or removed, since it might deceive people into thinking that it is not whitelisted. Just sayin...

If the bender has the respective sub-element, selecting the [block] as a source should do the following: Lava: launches in a arch-shape fashion and deals firedamage taking a rough number of 3-4.5 hearts. WaterManipulation counters it when collided (turns it into temporal obsidian block), but...

How about we give it to StrangeOne101's WGBendingFlag actual official support? Doing so would make it alot easier/cleaner to allow bending while restricting (for example) grief/build at the same time in a region? Also, since there will be more than 1 dev working as it becomes official feature...

It's just Bloodbending, so shouldn't it be dark blue (water sub's color)?

Reading the trello and I found this: "The glowstone passive will still be there but it would a sea lantern instead of a glowstone." I personally don't like turning it into sea lantern. I would only like to have the glowstone block in my server. Potential Solutions: Simple, to make it a...

I'd say why not. It's not like it should be a "must have", but more "ok cool". Making seperate per element would definantly make it (for some people) more cleaner/organize. Seperate custom from offficial? Isn't this already a thing? Or are you referring for a config that creates one big config...

What's wrong with watermanipulation? Why is waterwhip soo necessary? Išsiųsta naudojantis SM-G313HN Tapatalk 4 Lt

Tbh, I would have bothered to comment on this thread :D No offense, but seeing too many ideas chunked in one thread had me sick for a minute or two LOL

I'm not judging. I'm just giving my critism. By the looks, yeah it isn't a rip of. But for the usage of it - it actually is You're welcome.

Ah Ok.

" Concept Designers should not lock a thread within its first 24 hours. It is necessary that we have a period of debate on every suggestion within the community. Any staff member chiming in should only be to further debate, pose fruitful questions, etc." Well the post states otherwise.

Doesn't really fit and I do not think it would be possible. Because: 1)there's a reason why potions in-game require source/full to make them magica 2)waterbenders never did showcase a power to brew potions. Not canon It's not bending related at all. Either it would be a better fit for RPG sub...

Not implement, but I'm saying leaving a reply if you cannot decide what mark it should be :p Oh, and with the new etiquee, I don't think you guys can unless there is at least one reply :p Oh can we contribute to an idea that has zero responses, because of the necro rule?